Invited talk at the
International Symposium on Carbon Nanotube
in Commemoration of its Quarter-Century Anniversary (CNT25),
Tokyo, Japan, November 15-18, 2016.
The Enlightened Path
of Nanotechnology:
From 0D to 1D and 2D Nanostructures
David Tománek
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Michigan State University, USA
E-mail: tomanek@pa.msu.edu
Even though nanometer-sized objects have been known for a long
time, it is fair to associate the birth of Nanotechnology with the
synthesis and identification of the 0D-C60 fullerene
molecule in 1985 that was rewarded by the Nobel Prize in 1996 [1].
Yet for many scientists, the real trigger igniting the
Nanotechnology Revolution was the reported synthesis and
characterization of crystalline 1D multi-wall carbon nanotubes in
1991, 25 years ago [2]. Nanotubes have remained the dominant topic
in Physics, Chemistry and Engineering of nanostructures for almost
two decades that followed. Intensive search for applications
followed and resulted in significant progress. Nanotubes have been
shown capable of containing molecules such as C60 [3],
uncommon double-helices of selenium [4], and - as chemical
reaction vessels - of converting enclosed molecules to diamond
nanowires [5]. Unique properties of 1D carbon nanotubes, such as
their unprecedented electrical and thermal [6] conductivity,
combined with mechanical strength and flexibility, naturally lead
to increased interest in their 2D counterpart, graphene. Progress
in exfoliation and identification of unprecedented transport
properties in graphene [7] resulted in a second Nobel Prize to a
carbon nanostructure in 2010. Graphene appeared as an ideal 2D
material with one significant shortcoming, namely the absence of a
robust and reproducible band gap that is required for electronic
applications. After a decade of searching for a remedy, interest
has now turned to other 2D semiconductors with an intrinsic band
gap that bear promise for 2D electronics applications. Systems
capturing scientific interest now range from transition metal
dichacogenides such as MoS2 to very different and
unusual group V monolayers including phosphorene [8].
[1] H. Kroto, J. R. Heath, S. C. O'Brien, R. F. Curl, and
R. E. Smalley, Nature 318, 162 (1985).
[2] S. Iijima, Nature 354, 56 (1991).
[3] Y.-K. Kwon, D. Tománek, and S. Iijima,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1470 (1999).
[4] T. Fujimori, R. B. dos Santos, T. Hayashi, M. Endo, K. Kaneko,
and D. Tománek, ACS Nano 7, 5607 (2013).
[5] J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Feng, H. Ishiwata, Y. Miyata, R. Kitaura,
J. E. P. Dahl, R. M. K. Carlson, N. A. Fokina, P. R. Schreiner, D.
Tománek, and H. Shinohara,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 3717 (2013).
[6] S. Berber, Y.-K. Kwon, and D. Tománek,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4613 (2000).
[7] K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, S. V. Morozov, D. Jiang, Y.
Zhang, S. V. Dubonos, I. V. Grigorieva, and A. A. Firsov, Science
306, 666 (2004).
[8] H. Liu, A. T. Neal, Z. Zhu, Z. Luo, X. Xu, D. Tománek,
and P. D. Ye, ACS Nano 8, 4033 (2014).
|